Frank Bax wrote: > > Marco Peereboom wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 01:08:25AM +0000, JC Choisy wrote: > >> That being out of the way, you got me wondering what good is > >> any integrity check which failure is OK. > > > > It is only meant to help uptight people having some sort of false > sense > > of integrity/security. It really is for release only because > snapshots > > are a moving target. In my opinion the whole check is a giant waste > of > > time because every damn time the snaps are out of sync for a reason > or > > another people come whining to the list about something that is > > irrelevant. > > > Am I correct in assuming that the code before this integrity check is > not able to distinguish between release and snapshot?
Imagine the fun&games when the snapshots work and the release does not. Do people bother to think anymore?
