Adam M. Dutko wrote: >> Any good reason to not do this? >> >> > They're not the same shell.
Yes, I know that part :) > I can't think of any security reasons because > I'm not familiar with the code but as far as logs and noise factor I imagine > it would go up or various things might start breaking that depend on csh. Base seems to only have two shells as ksh and sh have the same md5 checksum. I'm hoping csh is only included for historical reasons or in honor of Bill Joy or something such as that. Brad
