On 8/13/2010 at 11:26 PM Benny LC6fgren wrote: |Steve Shockley wrote: |> On 8/13/2010 2:55 AM, [email protected] wrote: |>> Is there someone to advice me about the choice of the MTA ? |> |> I've used Courier-MTA on OpenBSD for a few years. I think it's a good |> choice if you want an all-in-one package but you don't think your mail |> server should come with an OS (Zimbra). | |I'll second that. We've used Courier-MTA for at least five years and it |is very robust with rock-solid performance and a good security record. | |(We use sendmail too btw, in spam-filtering mail frontends.) | |Unfortunately Courier-MTA isn't in ports (although its cousins Courier- |IMAP and Courier-POP3 are), but it is pretty straight-forward to compile |from source (read up carefully on the rather lengthy but well-documented |compile-and-install process though). | |http://www.courier-mta.org/ =============
I've used courier-imap for a few years on one of my servers. I like it because of the dedication to implementing standards and that I don't see stupid security mistakes in it.
