Yes, there are still bugs in mandoc(1), and... we hope they will
get fixed.
Keep looking, keep reporting them -- to schwarze and kristaps
in particular.
> > This should indeed be reported, thanks.
>
> ok, here's something that doesn't look right (hmm, I should
> probably file a bug?)
>
> man sh (snapshot i386 from today):
>
> The following forms of parameter substitution can also be used:
>
> Pf ${#name}
> The number of positional parameters if name is `*', `@', or not
> specified; otherwise the length of the string value of parameter
> name.
>
> Pf ${#name[*]}
> Pf ${#na...@]}
> The number of elements in the array name.
>
>
> on an older system (4.6):
>
> The following forms of parameter substitution can also be used:
>
> ${#name}
> The number of positional parameters if name is `*', `@', or not
> specified; otherwise the length of the string value of parameter
> name.
>
> ${#name[*]}
> ${#na...@]}
> The number of elements in the array name.
