David: sorry for the duplicate, I meant to send this to misc@ the first time.


On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 17:49, David Vasek <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Nick Holland wrote:
>
>> David Vasek wrote:
>
>>>> From http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq12.html#amd64better :
>>>
>>> 12.3.3 - Is it always better to run OpenBSD/amd64 on processors that
>>>         support it?
>>>
>>>   Not always.
>>>
>>>    There are a number of reasons one may desire to use OpenBSD/i386 over
>>>    OpenBSD/amd64, even on hardware that supports amd64 code:
>>> [...]
>>>    * Need for ability to move disks to another machine that isn't amd64
>>>      capable
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Do I understand it right that disks (FFS, disklabel?) from OpenBSD/i386
>>> cannot be accessed on OpenBSD/amd64 or vice versa?
>>
>> ACCESSED, yes, you can access data on your amd64 disks on an i386 system.
>>
>> That sentence was intended to refer to repair.  If your amd64 system craps
>> out and you need to pull the disks out and put it in another machine and
>> have it Just Work (or work with minimal effort), you need to  have another
>> amd64-compatible processor.  That wasn't referring to a file system issue,
>> but rather a rapid repair issue.
>
> I see, it refers to something else. It's clear now. May I suggest a slight
> modification to that sentence in the FAQ then?
>
>    * Need for ability to move disks with already installed
>      operating system to another machine that isn't amd64 capable
>

Having an OS installed doesn't mean you're going to boot from it. I'd rather:
* Need for ability to boot disks on other machines that aren't amd64 capable.

>
>> Best way I know of to back up a lot of odd machines is to one store is
>> running your favorite backup application so it dumps its data over ssh
link
>> to the one machine (which you have a spare of for repair purposes) which
has
>> the backup media attached to it.
>
> I agree, this is approximately what I am doing, but sometimes a directly
> connected USB-attached disk comes handy.
>
>> however, if "Different architectures" means amd64 and i386, no issues at
>> all.
>
> Yes, i386 and amd64 currently, but I would like to stay compatible with
> sparc64 too. However, sparc64 is big-endian so I am out of luck anyway. And
> "foreign" filesystems (ext2fs) are so slow on OpenBSD.
>

If it's for backup purposes only, speed MAY not affect you so badly.
Is it weekly backups of one or two gigs? or a lot more frequent
backups/a lot moremore data.

> Thanks, Nick.
>
> Regards,
> David

Reply via email to