On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 04:19:28PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Owain Ainsworth <[email protected]> [2009-07-14 16:12]: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 03:23:09PM +0200, Nido wrote: > > > According to the xclock man page, under options, at '-render', it > > > claims using Xrender is default when xclock is compiled with Xrender > > > support. > > > > > > However; running xclock without arguments looks the same as when ran > > > with the -norender option. Running xclock with the -render gives > > > smooth clock hands, so it seems reasonable to me to assume Xrender > > > support is built in and works. > > > > > > This is tested on my laptop with a -current snapshot from 07/07. The > > > video card is an Intel GM965 builtin (8086 2a03). > > > > You are correct. However, xclock is part of the X.org project and thus > > it would be best if you could report this bug upstream at > > http://bugs.freedesktop.org. > > if memory serves we changed the default locally tho.
Ah. Personally, i don't mind either changing the manpage, or switching the default back. I can't remember the reason why it was changed, can anyone remind me? -0- -- Earn cash in your spare time -- blackmail your friends
