On 2009-05-08, Alexander Shikoff <[email protected]> wrote: > I only have two serial ports on motherboard, I see them in dmesg: > com0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > com1 at isa0 port 0x2f8/8 irq 3: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > > But if I understand correctly they are named as cua0[0..1]. > >> PCI serial cards typically attach as puc(4), meaning com(4) devices >> should appear.. or pccom(4).. if you're using a release <= OpenBSD >> 4.3. > Yes, they appear in dmesg: > puc0 at pci1 dev 10 function 0 "Digi Neo-8" rev 0x05: ports: 8 com > com3 at puc0 port 0 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > com4 at puc0 port 1 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > com5 at puc0 port 2 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > com6 at puc0 port 3 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > com7 at puc0 port 4 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > com8 at puc0 port 5 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > com9 at puc0 port 6 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > com10 at puc0 port 7 irq 11: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo > > I guess they are mapped to cuac0..cuac7?
the letter after cua depends on the port type; we use cuac# for cy(4), cuaU# for USB serial ports, cua## for ns16x50-like devices. think those are the only choices for serial ports at the moment. for your puc(4) look at cua03..cua10 (dial-out devices) or tty03..tty10 (terminal devices; see "man 4 tty" for the difference between cua/tty). >> Are you able to post a dmesg? > Of course, see attached file. attachments get stripped; you provided enough inline this time, but one to bear in mind for the future.
