Something else that is trouberling me also, other then the face its wd2b and
wd1b. When I do raidctl -s raid0 it says 

Raid0 Components:
        Component0: failed
        /dev/wd1b: optimal

No spares
...
This doesn't seam right to me and bearing in mind, the command I am having
trouble with is raidctl -vF component0 raid0 I wonder if the 2 things are
connected...

On that wd1/2b note, when I actually view my raid0 table, it is correct

16 partitions:
#                size           offset  fstype [fsize bsize  cpg]
  a:         10485760                0  4.2BSD   2048 16384    1
  b:          2097152         10485760    swap
  c:       1953375360                0  unused      0     0
  d:        104857600         12582912  4.2BSD   2048 16384    1
  e:       1048576000        117440512  4.2BSD   2048 16384    1
  f:         20971520       1166016512  4.2BSD   2048 16384    1
  g:          2097152       1186988032  4.2BSD   2048 16384    1
  h:         20971520       1189085184  4.2BSD   2048 16384    1
  i:         20971520       1210056704  4.2BSD   2048 16384    1

so the raid has swap on B but the 2 disks have the RAID on b...so I think
that is correct...but again, I'm not too sure and searching around hasn't
helped so far...

Thanks, again
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
J.C. Roberts
Sent: 30 March 2009 13:16
To: Chris Harries
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: raidctl -vF component0 raid0

On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:43:31 +0100 "Chris Harries"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> START disks
> /dev/wd2b # the fake device
> /dev/wd1b
>  

The above looks weird. The 'b' partition is typically swap.

What do the following commands tell you?

        $ sudo disklabel -n wd1

        $ sudo disklabel -n wd2


-- 
J.C. Roberts

Reply via email to