On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 06:29:22PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote: > Claudio Jeker wrote: >>> Fell free to disagree, that's fair. >>> >> >> Sorry, I don't get it a non-developer tries to educate a developer about >> how kernel crashes should be reported? Sorry most of your standpoints are >> just wrong. Sure people are encuraged to run snapshot kernels but >> selfbuilt kernels are fine as long as they're built from a unmodified >> GENERIC config. Let us developers take care of yelling at those people who >> send in bad bug reports because we're acctually the people who may fix it >> in the end. > > Hi All, > > I stand corrected on this one. I was bias in my reply, I must admit it > and come clean on it! > > No offense intended to anyone it may have offended. I was quick to reply > to Steph as I did react to the content of the email and the linux name > in the email address. My fault to react to quickly on this one. I should > have know better!
Mmmmh... Did you happen to confuse Steph and me? We have similar names. > Not only did I put my foot in my mouth, but I swallow the boot as well. > > I follow cvs for years and I didn't see Insan as making changes to the > tree, so I didn't know he actually was a developers or I would have > known better and I miss a chance to just shut up! I didn't see his name > on the list either. My bad! Claudio meant me I guess, not Insan. I personally don't really think that having an account on cvs.openbsd.org automatically makes someone omniscient, so I see nothing wrong with being corrected by people who don't have an account there. But the arguments have to be convincing of course (in this case they weren't but we already know that). > Insan, please accept my apologies on a misplace reply to you on my part! That's the most important part. Thanks for apologizing to him! Stefan
