On 2008/10/25 12:34, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> > I see that behaviour if the table is not referenced in a rule (whether
> > or not it's marked const, whether or not the optimizer is enabled).
> > And it does correctly get marked const ("c" flag in -sT -v).
> >
> Sorry, I was stupid. :( "persist" keyword saves the Earth! Anyway,
> somehow your reply made me think of it, so thanks. :)
>
> (My problem was that I defined table in pf.conf and used it only in
> authpf rules files).
Ah, I was getting persist and const mixed up then.. yes that's exactly
it.
