On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 01:51:13AM -0600, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > On Sat, 9 Aug 2008 20:25:59 -0300 > Daniel Bareiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Aug 09, 2008 at 17:22:58 -0300, > > Marco Peereboom wrote: > > > > > > On Aug 9, 2008, at 10:23 AM, "Roberto Pereyra" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Look this link: > > > > > > > > http://contenidosonline.blogspot.com/2007/01/raid-1-por-software-con-openbsd.html > > > > > All the information regarding softraid is in man bioctl bio & softraid. > > > > > > Raidframe is a little oldish these days. I am a few features away > > > before we can start thinking about chunking it in favor if softraid. > > > > And it is already sufficiently robust like being used in stable systems? > > Yes, except that it is a recipe for a _fast_ disk only since there is > yet no (to my knowledge) an easy way to recover from an actual hw failure.
That is correct. I am actively working on rebuild (this time for real henning!). > > Dhu > > > > What experience you had using it? There is some other guide of softraid > > beyond man pages? > > > > Thanks to both for your replies. > > > > Regards, > > Daniel > > iEYEARECAAYFAkieJ1YACgkQZpa/GxTmHTfamQCeNwirXaW4ckiqfZH3ZQE2ETBQ > > sX0AniyFRqHzGhrNkOZM/+kd7Aau/cUS > > =FVMu > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
