I got non-deliverable receipts back from Nick when I sent this last message: http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/openbsd-misc/2008/7/12/2438104
Apparently Nick is not getting my email, or I've ended up on his blacklist for some reason. Nick, if you're reading this, could you drop me a mail? Is ropers at gmail dot com on your blacklist? Is nick at holland-consulting dot net still the correct email address to reach you under? Sorry for the noise, --ropers 2008/7/15 Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification > > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Technical details of permanent failure: > TEMP_FAILURE: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by > the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for > further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other > server returned was: 451 451 Temporary failure, please try again later. > (state 15). > > ----- Original message ----- > > Received: by 10.114.195.19 with SMTP id s19mr15258750waf.110.1215843515313; > Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:18:35 -0700 (PDT) > Received: by 10.114.179.20 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:18:35 -0700 (PDT) > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 08:18:35 +0200 > From: ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Paul de Weerd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Decipering "Understanding IP addressing" > Cc: "Nick Holland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected] > In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Disposition: inline > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > 2008/7/11 Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> I must admist, I've only read the parts you pointed out, but so far >> I'm very much impressed with how they managed to totally confuse the >> reader with incorrect statements and wrong examples. The section on >> IPv6 is probably best removed or mostly rewritten. > > I could use pdfedit to remove pages 43 through 51 (pages 45 thru 53 of > the pdf), and I also had that thought. But entirely removing that part > may make it harder to get 3com to accept the changed version. OTOH it > > ----- Message truncated -----
