On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 06:46:43PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Three choices.
>
> It is obvious where the developers play. But it hard to see how some
> fictional model chosen by very small Linux distributions would benefit
> us.
Not sure about amount of time sacrificed each time to prepare new complete
release... but perhaps it could be spared, if the system+packages is
"refreshed" piece-by-piece / month-by-month?
>From the users' point of view: no need to reinstall at all - while having
always the latest release (just because there's only that "latest").
Above are my rather theoretical thoughts... not sure, just asking.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
