"Dave Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > that, when discussing queueing, the pf FAQ mentions only CBQ and PRIQ > while man pf.conf(5) also defines HFSC.
It's probably a matter of coming up with an example configuration that is simple enough to present well within the probable reader's attention span and fits document's format, corresponds reasonably well to a situation a prospective reader would regognize, and with the characteristics to demonstrate what makes HFSC stand out as the better algorithm for that particular application, in an example that is sophisticated enough to demonstrate a reasonably complete set of significant parameters while keeping the reader's focused on the relative strengths of the algorithm rather than getting lost in potentially confusing detail. That just about sums up why writing up something along those lines is still on my list of things to do, rather than written and published already. I will keep trying, the general task juggling allowing. I realize this probably sounds terribly condescending, that's not what I intended. It's just that some subjects are in fact very hard to write well. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
