On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 03:53:52PM +0200, Michael Dexter wrote:
> >Are they willing to take a suggestions from the users side?
>
> Ask them.
During last 3 weeks I tried to contact 3 (yes, three) devs. None of them
responded even with "get lost".
> However, you will get far further with suggestions backed by a solid
> understanding of each issue, plus funding. The benefits of a broad yet
> shallow feature set can be found in most alternative operating systems and
> you are welcome to use them.
Who said, it must be about new features? There is an issue, about which I
wrote already - OK, once more:
I noticed, that default path, where software from binary pkg and "ports"
gets unpacked, is /usr/local hierarchy - unfortunately, it's also the
"traditional" default of every individual source *.tar.gz package - such
way the software ported to OpenBSD gets mixed with any other package,
which I had installed. Wouldn't be reasonable to create new hierarchy,
especially for the "native" OpenBSD software (from binary packages and
ports) - I mean: something like /usr/pkg in NetBSD?
It doesn't need any funding to fix this.
--
pozdrawiam / regards
Zbigniew Baniewski
