oops: NON-Euclidean (still more accurate than a lot of ... on this thread)
Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 00:26:35 -0800 (PST) > Reid Nichol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > --- Tony Abernethy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote: > > > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:21:14 -0500 > > > > "Eliah Kagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > (There are also multiple useful, > > > > > mutually-inconsistent formal systems in both fields.) > > > > > > > > Provably so? > > > > > > > Euclidean and ono-Euclidian geometries should suffice. > > > > > > > > > > Google (including scholar.g) gave nothing of value (I see 4 results > > when I search for ono-Euclidean on g and nothing on scholar.g). Any > > specific references? Or something else that would yield results. > > > > > ono-Euclidian appears to reference something by Omar Kayam, an 11th c > Iranian _POET_. If we are to allow the arg. that Creationism > is science, > we might allow that such an "inconsistency" has meaning. > > Dhu > > > > best regards, > > Reid Nichol > > > > President Bush says: > > > > War Is Peace > > Freedom Is Slavery > > Ignorance Is Strength > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > ______________________ > > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. > > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
