Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If it's compatible with how you use the domain, it might help > to publish SPF records.
I suppose I'll never know how many receivers of spam claiming to be from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (yes, fresh from the source) and friends actually acted on the SPF info for the domain and skipped sending a bounce, but the ones that don't use SPF in any meaningful way still generate significant backscatter. Once [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spamtrap it won't matter much of course, except for any valid mail which might happen to venture out from the same IP address to somebody at datadok.no. -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
