On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 14:14:29 +0200
Pierre Riteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Le 16 sept. 07 ` 01:25, Sean Darby a icrit :
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hello fellows from the OpenBSD community,
> >
> > I just wanted to stop and smell the roses. I occasionally play
> > around with other systems, of the Unix variety and, for the sake of
> > seeing things through the looking glass, taking an outside
> > perspective, the occasional logging into MS Windows. The use of MS
> > Windows and so many Linux systems definitely puts me into
> > perspective. So much of it is, for
> > lack of a better word, crap. I suppose you can say I'm still "a lot
> > like
> > a Linux guy except I have kissed girls". ;) I focus on the glass
> > being half full rather than half empty (love Unix more than hate MS
> > Windows).
> >
> > I'm simply writing this message to say that I am thankful for
> > OpenBSD.
> >
> > Of the various systems we have to choose from - a few wonderful and
> > powerful ones and many that are frightening and senseless - it
> > helps to
> > remind oneself of things like, "secure by default" and...
> >
> > "Free, Functional, and Secure."
> >
> > Security was the original reason for my change to OpenBSD but I have
> > since discovered there is so much more than that. There are so many
> > features, one can quickly become overwhelmed.
> >
> > It shocked me to discover all of the supported architectures/
> > platforms.
> >
> > Use of PF is, simply putting it: wow!
> >
> > And OpenSSH... how much better can it get?!
> > It just keeps getting better!
> >
> > What else is there? A lot! I don't even know all of the greatness
> > in it.
> > (Thought I'd be glad to be enlightened of even more tasty features.)
> >
> > I'm learning that it seems pointless to be shocked at the amazing
> > features: for OpenBSD has established a higher standard than the
> > rest.
> >
> > These high standards are only to be expected, and that's certainly
> > something to be thankful for. I'm no programmer but can tell that
> > this system has the famously claimed "high quality code". No doubt
> > about it.
> >
> > I'm just an average guy who is working on the final stages of his
> > doctorate in music. It feels good to know that I'm running a system
> > that
> > I can fully trust and depend on. With the reputation of the system
> > and if that continues, I will certainly continue to use OpenBSD
> > throughout my entire career on at least one of my computers.
> >
> > Going back to those three words, I am honored to use a system that
> > is secure, functional and *free*! It's hard to say which of the
> > three I like having more, I don't think I could do without any of
> > them.
> >
> > Was it Benjamin Franklin who said this general message?
> > "They that can give up liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
> > deserve neither liberty nor safety."
> >
> > Question: Is it true there was a developer's comment line in the
> > Linux kernel that said, "Does this belong here?"
> 
> http://www.forbes.com/intelligentinfrastructure/2005/06/16/linux-bsd-
> unix-cz_dl_0616theo.html

Solaris is based on SVR4, not BSD. Looks like they're not very
competent.


Jona

-- 
"I am chaos. I am the substance from which your artists and scientists
build rhythms. I am the spirit with which your children and clowns
laugh in happy anarchy. I am chaos. I am alive, and tell you that you
are free." Eris, Goddess Of Chaos, Discord & Confusion

Reply via email to