On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 05:46:30PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 04:55:34PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > > The license is not an alternative. The alternative is between two > > > > licenses. > > > > > > > > The moment one chooses one them... it's that one henceforth. > > > > > > And... you are a judge? > > > > Theo, be as unreasonable as you want. > > I am not being unreasonable. You are not a judge, so stop acting like > you are one. You don't know the full story. I do not know the full > story either. But you are being a real prick on the lists here acting > as if you have everything all figured out, you, the judge.
I'm not the one calling people names. I wanted to understand the facts but nobody here wants to acknowledge that 3 of those files have *alternative* licensing. I agree fully with you all in the other 5 files which are not dual licensed. The full story I needed to know is clear on those 8 files involved in the diff on lkml you shows us, what I wanted to know is your understanding. I see now you seem to pretend that GPLv2 can't be chosen for those 3 files. > > The copyright notice tells the user he can choose between two licenses. > > If you choose the GNU GPL vs, you can't later on change to BSD or > > proprietary for that would be a copyright violation. > > > > *Copyright notice != license* > > I am glad you are so sure, so confident. Are you placing money on the > outcome? Many many other people are NOT SO SURE AT ALL. Sure, let's make a gentleman's bet. If on those three files that are dual licensed, I'm wrong, I'll donate 50 EUR to OpenBSD. I also encourage those who agree with me to do so as well. If you're wrong, you'll say sorry, publicly, ok? Again, I'm talking only about the 3 files that are dual licensed, since on the other 5 I agree with you, fully. Rui -- P'tang! Today is Setting Orange, the 26th day of Bureaucracy in the YOLD 3173 + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...?
