Maybe try to check and possibly replace the interfaces involve as well as the cables and let us know if this issue still occur.
> pfctl -x loud && tail -f /var/log/messages > > ~BAS > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Geraerts Andy wrote: > >> >>>> We have an OpenBSD firewall running for a while now. Since a few days we >>>> encounter some sort of selective natting. I try to ping a host, I get >>>> reply, >>>> and 2 minutes later I try to ping the same host and I dont get replies. >> >>> So despite the state being created in both instances, you see a packet >>> egress your external interface with the source address of the internal >>> host instead of the external interface of the NAT box? >> >> We indeed see the state being created. The packet egresses on the external >> interface >> without NAT. So the ip packet contains the source ip address of my laptop >> and therefor >> further on the path gets blocked because it isn't natted. A few >> seconds/minutes later >> I try again and everything works again. >> >> Is there a way to see why it isn't doing the NAT? >> >> (There are around 80 interfaces (vlan + carp) on the box.) >> >> Regards, >> >> Andy. >> >> >> >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.13/843 - Release Date: 10/06/2007 >> 13:39 >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended >> solely for >> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. >> If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager at >> : >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or call +32-(0)11-240234. >> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by Sophos >> for the >> presence of computer viruses. >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> >> > > l8* > -lava (Brian A. Seklecki - Pittsburgh, PA, USA) > http://www.spiritual-machines.org/ > > "Guilty? Yeah. But he knows it. I mean, you're guilty. > You just don't know it. So who's really in jail?" > ~Maynard James Keenan
