On Mon, 28 May 2007, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On 28/05/07, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But now the excutable starts.... so you can see with ktrace which
> > syscall is not implemented.
>
> 4362 ktrace RET ktrace 0
> 4362 ktrace CALL execve(0xcfbe1d1b,0xcfbe1bdc,0xcfbe1be4)
> 4362 ktrace NAMI "./a.out"
> 4362 a.out EMUL "linux"
> 4362 a.out RET oldolduname 0
> 4362 a.out CALL uname(0xcfbe4e66)
> 4362 a.out RET uname 0
> 4362 a.out CALL brk(0)
> 4362 a.out RET brk 135491584/0x8137000
> 4362 a.out CALL brk(0x8137c70)
> 4362 a.out RET brk 135494768/0x8137c70
> 4362 a.out CALL #243 (unimplemented linux_sys_set_thread_area)()
> 4362 a.out PSIG SIGSYS SIG_DFL code 0
> 4362 a.out NAMI "a.out.core"
>
> Something to do with threading?
yes, it tries to do a system call our linux emulation does not have,
-Otto
>
> --
> Best Regards
>
> Edd
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett
