Yes, the upgrading to 4.1 page mentions this.
-Bob
* Frank Bax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-20 12:43]:
> Is there a place that documents the spamd differences from 4.0 to 4.1; or
> am I left with detecting the differences in documentation? I see 41.htm
> mentions greylist sync which I won't need (although I could see a one-time
> use when migrating boxes); greytrapping sounds interesting, might try that
> (it's in man spamd). What's "noticing out of order MX use" - just a log
> entry? Are there any changes to existing functionality to be forewarned
> about; or just new features?
>
> I'm actually running a February snapshot (early 4.1 beta) if that makes a
> difference; this is considered "living on the edge" for me.
>
>
>
> At 12:59 PM 4/20/07, Bob Beck wrote:
>
> > Thanks. 4.1 has some major changes too, so bear in mind
> >spamd wise it's a big change from 4.0
> >
> > -Bob
> >
> >
> >* Frank Bax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-20 08:29]:
> >> I'm finally upgrading from 3.5 to 4.0! I use the whitelist from
> >puremagic
> >> and in the past 2.5 years I have also added another 10 ip addresses to
> >> spamd whitelist because of problems with mail getting through. This
> >week I
> >> did tests on 3 of those ip addresses and we are 3/3 for current spamd
> >> accepting connections without whitelist. Great job! I've also done some
> >> practice runs with in-place upgrades to snapshot; and plan to upgrade to
> >> 4.1 soon after disks arrive.
>
--
#!/usr/bin/perl
if ((not 0 && not 1) != (! 0 && ! 1)) {
print "Larry and Tom must smoke some really primo stuff...\n";
}
