On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:04:19PM +0200, Michal Soltys wrote:
> [ reminder about the routing table works ]
Whoops, you're right. It wasn't anything specific to sk0 and sk1, just
because of how I assigned IP addresses.
> Small correction to my prev post - messing with route / PF to enforce going
> over cable in both ways shouldn't probably yield any results here.
The following seems to work:
# ifconfig sk0 192.168.50.1
# ifconfig sk1 192.168.51.1
# route delete 192.168.50
# route delete 192.168.51
# route add 192.168.50 -interface 192.168.51.1
# route add 192.168.51 -interface 192.168.50.1
# ping 192.168.50.1
# ping 192.168.51.1
(I put sk0 and sk1 on separate subnets because route didn't seem to like
routing packets for a single host via an interface.)
``tcpdump -i lo0'' shows no output during the pings, so it seems like
the packets are all going over the ethernet cable.
Thanks.
