in my understanding a proper implementation does not require any service packs. in other words: if one implements something that later requires a service pack, this is not a proper implementation.
konstantin 2006/6/2, misiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > akonsu schrieb: > > no way. trust me. ;) > > > > > > We'll see, like many other security features in Windows, if they > implement > >> it *properly*. > >> > >> DS > > > > > > > You guys funny! > But to remind all you, with Servicepack 2 for XP, it is unpossible to > execute injected code... > Or did I understand something wrong? > > m
