On 2026-06-08, Claudio Jeker <[email protected]> wrote: >> Example: rdomain 50, vport50, veb50. This logical naming works great for >> readability everywhere. >> The interface numbering can already scale well beyond 255. Would there >> be any appetite to grow the rdomain limit to at least a 16bit field? > > This is a dumb reason that wastes memory. When creating rdomain 50 the > system will allocate 48 unused slots. Which may be ok but then someone > comes up with rdomain 4000 for vlan4000.
I've seen some switch that did this with vlan numbers too...
