Following up on this. I looked into the /var/log/messages/ and
/var/log/daemon. Both are quite after starting the portmap, mountd, and
nfsd services.

Here is verbose output from the client side when mounting the share:
```
[adming@cluster-node2]~% sudo mount -t nfs -o rw,noauto -v
192.168.0.122:/nfs/testdir
 /home/adming/mntpt2
mount.nfs: timeout set for Thu Feb  9 11:34:52 2023

mount.nfs: trying text-based options
'vers=4.2,addr=192.168.0.122,clientaddr=192.168.0.187'
mount.nfs: mount(2): Protocol not supported
mount.nfs: trying text-based options
'vers=4,minorversion=1,addr=192.168.0.122,clientaddr=192.168.0.187'
mount.nfs: mount(2): Protocol not supported
mount.nfs: trying text-based options
'vers=4,addr=192.168.0.122,clientaddr=192.168.0.187'
mount.nfs: mount(2): Protocol not supported
Created symlink
/run/systemd/system/remote-fs.target.wants/rpc-statd.service →
/usr/lib/systemd/system/rpc-statd.service.
mount.nfs: trying text-based options 'addr=192.168.0.122'
mount.nfs: prog 100003, trying vers=3, prot=6
mount.nfs: trying 192.168.0.122 prog 100003 vers 3 prot TCP port 2049
mount.nfs: prog 100005, trying vers=3, prot=17
mount.nfs: trying 192.168.0.122 prog 100005 vers 3 prot UDP port 724
[adming@cluster-node2]~% cd mntpt2
[adming@cluster-node2]~/mntpt2% ls
alfpha  testfile
[adming@cluster-node2]~/mntpt2% touch y
touch: cannot touch 'y': Permission denied
```

Am out of ideas as what to test/debug.



On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:27 PM Sandeep Gupta <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I have a default installation of openbsd, with portmap, mountd, nfsd
> services started via rcctl. I have following entry in /etc/exports
>
> /nfs/testdir -alldirs  -maproot=root -network=192.168.0 -mask=255.255.255.0
>
> I am able to mount the exported share on client (centos) as follows:
>
> sudo mount -t nfs -o rw,noauto -v 192.168.0.122:/nfs/testdir mntpt3
>
> From the client, I can read the contents. But writing inside the mounted
> directory yields permission denied error. Looking at the docs I am not able
> to find any otherconfig options for access control on the client side.
> There is nothing in the logs on the server side as well. Any pointers to
> debug/fix would be of great help.
>

Reply via email to