On 2021/07/23 11:13, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 10:04:25AM -0000, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2021-07-22, Sebastian Benoit <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> [ ...snip ]
> 
> > >
> > > The IO paths of those Atoms are slow. Disk IO is also lacking.
> > 
> > The D525, yes.
> > 
> > The C2758 should cope with much more than 650-700Mb/s though maybe
> > not with OpenBSD as-is, they're not as good as the Xeon D (especially
> > single-threaded performance) but they are still pretty capable.
> > 
> > If I was running into a performance wall with C2758 I'd add a NIC with
> > a driver that already supports multiple queues (ix is probably most
> > common, em doesn't have this yet) and see gow things go with the
> > "forwarding in parallel" diffs over on tech@.
> > 
> 
> I'll upgrade the NIC in the C2758 and retest.
> 
> Thank you very much for your help.

btw it's specifically those diffs with a nic with a multiqueue
driver that might help, changing the nic by itself /probably/ won't
make a huge difference. (If I've got it right, grepping drivers for
pci_intr_establish_cpu should find those with multiqueue; currently
the list looks to be bnxt ix ixl mcx vmx).

Reply via email to