Hello! aggr/trunk works on L2, the interfaces need to be able to share same IP address. What you're looking for is L3/L4 solution e. g. via pf(4).
-- Mr. Damian Szuberski DevOps/Continuous Integration Architect ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Cand Tec <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 17:49 To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: link aggregation config I've a few openbsd 6.8 installations running as a FW/router/vpn at some client offices. No problems, It just works! I would like to use openbsd 6.9 on x86 HW (either lanner device or dell rack mount svr) at this new client (mining industry). They're however in a bandwidth constrained location being a mining site. The current ISP - xplornet - provides an LTE-25 connection and from what I've been told, the connections terminate via an ethernet cable from ISP provided modem. The client has added 2 additional services for a total of 3 LTE connections. I would like to bundle these 3 connections to provide increased bandwidth for the local LAN. I was thinking of using aggr(4) to config the interfaces, but I need some clarification or direction on how best to achieve this. At the moment this is strictly for internet access and there are no session based services as yet. Based on what I see in the man aggr - ifconfig aggr0 create ifconfig aggr0 trunkport em0 ifconfig aggr0 trunkport em1 ifconfig aggr0 trunkport em2 ifconfig aggr0 192.168.1.100/24 ifconfig aggr0 up Do I need to assign the wan ips to the respective interfaces in the aggr0? I've looked at all the postings over the last 3 years so far and I've not come across anyone using a similar setup. Is there anyone doing this type of bonding with multiple wan ips? I'm not looking for fail-over or active/passive setups but mainly bonding. Thanks in advance for your comments
