Ok, under stood re ,prototype code... thought the Project was being extra conservative :) and that more people trying MPPF would be helpful, but if it aint ready for release it aint ready for release
re PF going away... I thought that was a Calendar Coincidence... now im feeling a slight up tick in my blood pressure :) On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 12:33, Theo de Raadt <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, this is not our style, it very much doesn't fit the development > process to have users running prototype code for 6 months. > > And anyways why do you want this, since pf is going away. > > Tom Smyth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I was wondering what devs / more experienced users think about > > having BSDMPPF kernel as an option in the upcoming release > > so that users could opt to test that by selecting alternate BSDMPPF kernel > > (without having to re-compile the kernel) > > > > the tested benefits on a PC engines apuc2 is at least 2x performance > > from my lab testing here > > > > I think having a higher install base of consistently complied generic > > kernels with > > pf enabled would be beneficial > > > > what do the more experienced users of OpenBSD think about this? > > > > are there any down sides with this approach ? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tom Smyth > > -- Kindest regards, Tom Smyth The information contained in this E-mail is intended only for the confidential use of the named recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering it to the recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone at the number above and erase the message You are requested to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment.
