And so the mission begins.

With an email.

Perhaps a wiki as a next step?

I see the critical word "starting".

Curious as to what has been "started".  Looks like nothing.

James Huddle <[email protected]> wrote:

> >An area that I am personally interested in is running
> >OpenBSD on fully open-source / binary-blob-free
> >hardware: hardware where there is no proprietary
> >firmware that could hide vendor backdoors, and
> >ideally where even the design of the chip is available
> >to the user for review.
> 
> (Heck yes)^2
> Of course this is hours of deep conversation away
> from something even approaching a realistic plan
> of attack; but Paul, with his embedded sys leanings
> might be in a good position to move things (slowly)
> forward. To the benefit of all computer security, everywhere.
> Personally, I envision a sort of "open source BIOS"
> library in the distant future.  Something we jack in on jtag
> if we have to.  There is no harm in *starting.*  Meanwhile,
> my super productive Dell laptop can't keep me from wondering
> what the SMM is doing during the SMI, while obsd or any other
> OS sleeps.
> -x*  every install.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:36 PM Frank Beuth <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 04:22:05AM +0000, Paul Swanson wrote:
> > >I have some general areas of interest, such as embedded
> > >computing, but nothing is set in stone yet, so I thought it'd
> > >be fun to hear from those in know about areas of priority need
> > >within the OpenBSD community.
> > >
> > >Are there particular problems that could benefit from new
> > >ideas or solutions?
> >
> > An area that I am personally interested in is running OpenBSD on fully
> > open-source / binary-blob-free hardware: hardware where there is no
> > proprietary
> > firmware that could hide vendor backdoors, and ideally where even the
> > design of
> > the chip is available to the user for review.
> >
> > The trouble is it's VERY hard to find "fully open" hardware, and the
> > hardware
> > which is known to exist (loongson, OpenPOWER, RISC V) is difficult to get,
> > expensive or not very good, and (except for loongson) not supported by
> > OpenBSD.
> >
> >

Reply via email to