* Gilles Chehade <[email protected]> le [21-11-2018 21:06:39 +0100]:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 06:38:43PM +0100, Thuban wrote:
> > * Edgar Pettijohn <[email protected]> le [21-11-2018 11:32:43 -0600]:
> > >
> > > On Nov 21, 2018 8:22 AM, Thuban <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I can't figure how to make this "junk" argument to work as
> > > > mentioned in The smtpd.conf manpages :
> > > >
> > > > If the junk argument is provided, the message will be
> > > > moved to the Junk folder if it contains a positive X-Spam
> > > > header.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > spams detected by spamassassin have multiple X-Spam-* headers, but
> > > > aren't placed
> > > > into Junk folder.
> > > >
> > > > Any advice ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > ?????? thuban
> > > >
> > > It looks for a header matching:
> > >
> > > X-Spam: Yes
> > >
> > > You may need to configure spamassassin to write it that way. I believe
> > > that the default is different, but I can't check right now.
> > >
> >
> > I tried to add this in spamassassin.conf [0] :
> >
> > add_header spam X-Spam
> >
> > But if you read the link [0] closely, it can't work because spamassassin add
> > headers "X-Spam-someting", never "X-Spam" :
> >
> > All headers begin with X-Spam- (so a header_name Foo will generate a
> > header called X-Spam-Foo)
> >
> > I guess the "junk" keyword in smtpd.conf was written to be handy, so I miss
> > something. Where ?
> >
>
> You didn't miss anything, the maildir agent only supports X-Spam headers
> as of today so this will need a diff to support SpamAssassin if it can't
> generate a X-Spam header.
>
Okay, thanks, I doubt since english is not my main language.
> SpamAssassin wasn't a target when I wrote that feature but it's just one
> diff away ;-)
>
Just need to check "X-Spam-Flag: YES" or "X-Spam-Status: Yes,.*" then.
Just curious, what was the target of that 'junk' feature ? rspamd ? Another ?
Regards.
--
thuban
