diego righi <[email protected]> wrote: > So let's say I'm a fool, I use a foolish partition layout, and the intel x86 > and amd64 architectures are tricky/shitty architectures with stupid bioses > which work bad, ok? > So why openbsd 6.4 i386 and amd64 bootloaders (not biosboot, boot!) > express different behavior? Wasn't openbsd about correctness? :/
Your attitude stinks. Did you really have to play that way? > If I'm wrong and it is documented that I can't do this fine, but so also > i386 should not work, this behavior is just strange for me, that's it. Diffs are welcome. But really the problem is you made a bunch of false statements and it is really easy for everyone to get bored and not want to help you.
