> Le sam. 8 sept. 2018 à 13:40, Jay Hart <[email protected]> a écrit :
>> -----ifconfig -A from the router------------------
>> re1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>>         lladdr 00:22:4d:d1:48:d5
>>         inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
>
>
> Some CPEs have 192.168.1.1 hardcoded as management ip address, even
> though they are currently used as modem/bridges. Renumber your
> internal subnet to some other private address space and see if the
> logs go away.
>
> One way to verify this theory is to configure another ip in that
> subnet on re0, renumber re1 to 192.168.2.0/24 for example, and try
> pinging 192.168.1.1.
>
>
If I shifted to the 10.10.10.x network, would I set all my machines to use /24 
subnet?

IOW, hostname.re1 would be
inet 10.10.10.x 255.255.255.0 NONE

I don't get why I would set up a second IP on re0, explain your thought process 
here...

I called Verizon and they stated that the ONTs MAC is not the MAC causing 
problems, and actually
told me it must be coming from my house.  I found my wifes PC had lost its 
network connection, I
have to use TL-PA4010 power adapters to get the last 10 feet of connections. 
I'm wondering if this
was causing the issue.  None of the MAC addresses for these devices are 
20:c0:47:... though.  I
think this was just nit noise...

Jay

Reply via email to