I'm guessing you are reacting to the jocular nature of my e-mail address. I admit it is a bit infantile, but I am just using it because I don't like my personal address to be published publicly.

As for the allusion to training certs, I am just messing around on my own private network to learn stuff. I have dealt with the proprietary stuff you're referring to back in school, but I strongly prefer OpenBSD and other well-written free software.

To summarize my actual question, I guess I am looking for a way to dynamically advertise my router's (DHCP-defined) host entries, but nothing else. I'm not sure what the best way is.

On 2018-05-20 20:00, justina colmena wrote:
What's this? Is there a giant email cock-up at 4:30am in the
https://chicken.coop/  ???

Or is someone trying to pass a certain proprietary networking IT
training cert?

     --> /var/www/cgi-bin/bgplg

*They* do not exactly want the BSD freeloaders looking at this stuff.
Somebody might need to tslk to the boss.

That thing actually is on my system "amarillo" in the cgi-bin folder,
but I don't think it's hooked up to anything at the moment.

-------- Original message --------
From: [email protected]
Date: 5/19/18 2:47 PM (GMT-09:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Intranet routing with dynamic IPs

Hi everyone,

I have a routing question which I don't know how to solve. I have two
routers. Both are connected to my ISP and get a dynamic IP. Both are
also connected to a local VLAN. I'd like to use the local VLAN for any

traffic in between the two and the ISP for everything else. Basically,

it should be like:

   # Router A
   1.2.3.x (DHCP)
   10.0.0.1/30
   10.0.1.1/24

   # Router B
   2.3.4.x (DHCP)
   10.0.0.2/30
   10.0.2.1/24

   # Network A: 10.0.1.0/24
   route 0.0.0.0/0 via 10.0.0.1
   route 2.3.4.x/32 via 10.0.0.2

   # Network B: 10.0.2.0/24
   route 0.0.0.0/0 via 10.0.0.2
   route 1.2.3.x/32 via 10.0.0.1

I've tried doing this with BGP with a config like this (on Router A,
by
example):

   AS 65001
   router-id 10.0.0.1
   network inet connected

   neighbor 10.0.0.2 {
           remote-as 65002
   }

The problem here is that a computer in Network A will now try to use
Router B to connect to IP-address 2.3.4.5, whereas I want it to use
Router A.

I'd appreciate if anyone could lead me in the right direction here.
The
reason why I'm doing is: I want to keep two networks separate, letting

them browse the Internet with different IP addresses, but use the
immediate link between the local routers for better performance.

Kind regards,
John Longe

Reply via email to