The FAQ6 section for VMM Networking incorrectly specified the range for Shared
Address Space. RFC6598 section 7 calls out 100.64.0.0/10
As far as I can tell, it’s just the FAQ that misstates this. The vm manpages
seem to all call out the correct range
--- faq6.html Wed Apr 4 06:19:18 2018
+++ faq6.html.patched Wed Apr 4 06:20:15 2018
@@ -668,7 +668,7 @@
(<a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6598">RFC6598</a>) are similar
to private addresses in that they are not globally routable, but are
intended to be used on equipment that can perform address translation.
- The address space is <tt>10.64.0.0/10</tt>.
+ The address space is <tt>100.64.0.0/10</tt>.
</ul>
<h3>Option 1 - VMs only need to talk to the host and each other</h3>
@@ -695,7 +695,7 @@
<a href="pf/nat.html">Network Address Translation</a>:
<blockquote><pre>
-match out on egress from 10.64.0.0/10 to any nat-to (egress)
+match out on egress from 100.64.0.0/10 to any nat-to (egress)
</pre></blockquote>
Reload the pf ruleset and the VM(s) can now connect to the internet.