On 2018-01-25, Lyndon Nerenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have an IPsec conundrum I'm trying to solve.  Yes, the scenario
> is somewhat absurd; it's also the problem I've been taksed with
> solving, so spare the peanut gallery comments, okay?
>
>
> NET-P <x> GW-Q <-> internet <-> GW-H <x> GW-V <x> NET-V
>
> NET-P is 10.0.2.0/24
> NET-V is 10.0.11.0/24
>
> GW-Q is an OpenBSD host with fixed addresses 10.0.2.1 (inside) and
> 1.2.3.4 (internet).
>
> GW-H is some random ISP cable/DSL modem that NATs everything behind
> it, with a random external address. (I.e., assume DHCP on the
> "internet" side.)
>
> GW-V is an OpenBSD host. It has a variable upstream address obtained
> from the back end of GW-H (DHCP).  On the other side, GW-V presents
> 10.0.11.1 to NET-V.
>
> The goal here is to establish an IPsec tunnel that links NET-P and
> NET-V together, in the face of all the other nonsense in between.
>
> In the schematic above, '<x>' represents a NAT translation point.
> '<->' is a regular router interconnect.
>
> I have tried setting up an IKEv2 passive connection from GW-V to
> GW-Q (connections in the other direction are impossible), but I'll
> be damned if I can figure out how to specify the SA associations
> and ESP flows on GW-V, given the lack of fixed addresses on the
> upstream sides of GW-V and GW-H.  (Or in the other direction, for
> that matter.)
>
> Is there any hope this can possibly work?

That's a pretty standard setup. I don't have an iked one handy to crib
from but ipsec.conf/isakmpd looks like this:

- natted side

ike dynamic esp from $natted_side_net/27 to $other_net/21 \
        peer $remote_external_IP \
        main auth hmac-sha1 enc aes group modp3072 \
        quick enc aes-128-gcm group modp3072 srcid myname

- side with real ip

ike passive esp from $other_net/21 to any \
        main auth hmac-sha1 enc aes group modp3072 \
        quick enc aes-128-gcm group modp3072 srcid othername

iked should be similar, use "ikev2 active" on the natted side, "ikev2
passive" on the static-ip side.

Watch out for "nat helpers" on GW-H that try to fix things up but actually
break them but there aren't usually problems these days.


Reply via email to