Ingo Schwarze wrote: > > this could just be memcmp. > > I avoided that over quibbles about the argument type (off_t vs. > size_t), though i admit that database files larger than a Gigabyte > make no sense at all. > > If you consider that an improvement, i'm not opposed to using > memcmp(3). But i don't really have a good idea what to do if > st_size does happen to exceed SIZE_MAX. Maybe just error out?
in that case, you have already failed to mmap it, so i wouldn't worry too much.
