On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Jiri B <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 03:49:27PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote: >> So you have the VM interface and the host interface on a bridge: >> dhclient on the host "steals" all DHCP packets via BPF. >> >> Try to pkill dhclient on the host and the VM should be able to get DHCP. >> >> There is currently no solution for that, it is the way our dhclient works, >> you can try to run the VM on a NAT'ed bridge or use "-L" local interfaces. > > What about using vether with bridge and having host's dhclient using > vether?
That is my solution to the same problem. Essentially I've had to make my "primary" interface into a vether. Without this bug, I could have used em2 (in this case) directly. Now I use vether and em2 in a bridge.
