erk. And Stuart reminded me, off list, that I had forgotten to mention that the code depends on calling bc with the "-l" option, for the "library" power of e function I'm using below.
I'm just not with it today. On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Joel Rees <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, neverr mind. Sorry about the noise. > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joel Rees <[email protected]> wrote: >> Given the following code, >> >> ---------------------------- >> define vc(vs,t,r,c) { >> return vs * (1-e(-t/(r*c))); >> } >> >> scale = 5; >> vs = 120; >> r = 60; >> c = .01; >> for ( t=0.0; t<5.0; t += 0.1 ) { >> vc = vc(vs,t,r,c ); >> vr = vs - vc; >> a = vr / r; >> p = vr * a; >> print"t: ", t, " vc:", vc(vs,t,r,c ), " a: ", a, " p: ", p, "\n" >> } >> ---------------------------- >> >> openbsd's bc puts out a lot of >> >> bc: [Unicode proxy 0001 or so](01) is unimplemented >> >> messages. In spite of those messages, it seems to be running alright, >> seems to give correct answers mixed in with the messages about >> unimplemented (operations?). >> >> I get the messages whether I type it in by hand or copy/paste it from my >> blog. >> >> Is this known behavior? > > I remember now. Identifiers are only one letter: > > -------------------- > define v(s,t,r,c) { > return s * (1-e(-t/(r*c))); > } > > scale = 5; > s = 120; > r = 60; > c = .01; > for ( t=0.0; t<5.0; t += 0.1 ) { > v = v(s,t,r,c ); > z = s - v; > a = z / r; > p = z * a; > print "t: ", t, " vc:", v, " a: ", a, " p: ", p, "\n" > } > -------------------- -- Joel Rees Be careful when you look at conspiracy. Arm yourself with knowledge of yourself, as well: http://reiisi.blogspot.jp/2011/10/conspiracy-theories.html
