On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Michael McConville <[email protected]> wrote: > Joel Rees wrote: >> Daniel Ouellet wrote: >> > > Secondly, this whole thread should have ended long ago. >> > >> > So why you keep it going then. >> > >> > Let it die please >> >> Flame wars are educational, for readers with an open mind. > > Flame wars and crypto speculation also make a lot of noise and drive > more focused readers off the list. See the misc-like list of a common > anonymity network for a prime example of this.
That's why I'm suggesting the open mind part. And the think first, and rant in your own blog if you have to part. Especially if you want to speculate. (It's easier to edit/delete/tag-as-too-wild-to-take-seriously a post to your own blog than a post to a mailing list.) -- Joel Rees Be careful when you look at conspiracy. Arm yourself with knowledge of yourself, as well: http://reiisi.blogspot.jp/2011/10/conspiracy-theories.html
