I run OpenVPN on a pair of carped up gateways ....
What are you trying to achieve with this very odd sounding config.
There may be a more straightforward way to get there.
Adam Wysocki wrote:
Hi,
I have an OpenVPN server running on OpenBSD. I use tunX interface in tap
mode (as far as I know, it's the OpenBSD equivalent of tapX interface from
Linux, so it should be bridgeable):
dev tun1
dev-type tap
No IP is assigned to this interface, because I want to bridge two OpenVPN
interfaces and one Ethernet interface and assign IP address directly to a
bridge.
OpenVPN is running and ifconfig looks like that:
tun1: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
priority: 0
groups: tun
status: active
However:
gof@bsd:~$ sudo ifconfig bridge0 create
gof@bsd:~$ sudo ifconfig bridge0 add tun1
ifconfig: bridge0: tun1: Invalid argument
Bridge ifconfig:
bridge0: flags=0<>
groups: bridge
priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp
Can I do something to solve it?
--
Dag H. Richards ( no title / no lettres )
The first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club.
This message may or may not contain proprietary information.
Since it is being relayed by SMTP across an unknown number of
relays to its destination, using a protocol that is traditionally
plain ASCII, it's silly to pretend it is still confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
there is simply nothing I can do about that. Attempting to bind you
to some destruction protocol through this windbag sig paragraph is
Quixotic at best..
