Hi, I was pointed to a diff that was posted on tech@ a couple of years back by sthen@ which was created by mikeb@, there was a brief discussion regarding the patch & then nothing, I was wondering if it's worth revisiting / continuing the dialogue to reach a conclusion. http://marc.info/?t=135405119400003&r=1&w=3
The discussion came about through me discovering that if your device nodes are not numbered sequentially, processes which rely on those device nodes fail to start, in this case I'd somehow managed to screw up how i'd invoked jot when creating additional bpf(4) nodes to cover the requirements for dhcpd to bind to all necessary interfaces. Functionality like this would be cool to have as it's one less thing that needs to be handled on a new build. Regards, Sevan / Venture37
