I suspect procfs is only enabled on i386 because that's the only arch with compat_linux support? If so, anyone who relies on compat_linux support should be sure to test and report back if they have problems.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Philip Guenther <[email protected]> wrote: > If you're currently using procfs, please respond with exactly what parts of > it are actually needed by the programs you run. Without a good reason to > keep it, it'll be deleted, as I broke listing of /proc back in January and > no one has noticed, suggesting that no one is actually using it... > > Philip Guenther > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Philip Guenther <[email protected]> > Date: Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 2:15 PM > Subject: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: src > To: [email protected] > > > CVSROOT: /cvs > Module name: src > Changes by: [email protected] 2014/06/22 15:15:51 > > Modified files: > sys/arch/i386/conf: GENERIC > > Log message: > PROCFS has been broken for months without complaints, so stop building it > > suggested by sthen@
