On Sun 09 Mar 2014 10:24:51 AM CDT, Adam Thompson wrote:
Perhaps my google-fu isn't working today...
Running 5.4-RELEASE.
I've installed (from packages) php-5.3, I *did* follow the pkg
instructions to symlink the various config files, but I now get:
[email protected]:/root# httpd
httpd:/usr/local/lib/php-5.3/libphp5.so: undefined symbol 'unixd_config'
[...chop...]
This is httpd from base, and php straight from packages - how on earth
did I break it?
Update:
1. confirmed this happens on a bare, virgin install with
php-5.3.27-ap2.tgz. I don't see any errata on this, am I just blind?
2. recompiled from ports, which did *not* produce the "-ap2" flavour,
and the generic package seems to work.
3. confirmed the original non-ap2 binary package *does* work as
expected.
I'm now confused, because I don't see a -ap2 flavour in the Makefile,
where does this come from? What does it do?
Oh, !@#$%^!!!!. I just figured it out, I think - the "-ap2" flavour is
for people who are using Apache 2.x from ports, the bare flavour is for
people running httpd from base. I keep forgetting OpenBSD's httpd is
based on the 1.x stream. I assumed the -ap2 just meant it used the APR
v2 libraries, which, of course, implies Apache v2.x, which, of course,
is not what I'm trying to run on.
It would, however, be a good thing if it were possible to, in the
future, edit the package description for the Apache 2.x version to
indicate that... there's no externally-visible evidence (for the
easily-confused among us, like me, apparently) to distinguish the two
packages other than the -ap2 suffix on the filename. I can't even
figure out how the ports infrastructure builds that version, so I'm
unable to submit a patch.
I don't know if we've finally removed httpd from base in 5.5, but of
course that would obviate the need for the two versions of the
package... I guess nginx would either use the -fpm flavour, or run it
as a CGI?
-Adam
