On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 05:44:05PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Nick Holland <[email protected]> wrote: > > > First, at this point, tmpfs is hopefully going to be replacing mfs (see > > mount_tmpfs(8)). > > A word of caution: So far, if pushed hard enough, tmpfs is > (1) losing files and (2) slower than actual storage on SSD.
The 1st is unfortunately not reproduceable under conditions needed to debug it, and the 2nd one is dependent on a lot of parameters, like swap (measurement of mfs under same conditions welcome).
