Seems like it would be pretty straightforward to NAT, no?
/------existing servers /28
EVIL ----- lie agreed upon [Puffy] <
\-----new servers on RFC 1918
Would need to know more to make better recommendations.
On 9/4/13 8:24 PM, patrick keshishian wrote:
Hi Networking gurus,
Say I have /28 address space. Between them and the internet is
pf. Not all of the addresses are in use ATM.
I may have the need to add a couple new servers behind that pf
server within the same /28 range. Problem: I need to have traffic
between the new servers and what already exists filtered through
some pf.
Ideally I would like to put the new servers together on a new
(unmanaged) switch and connect one of the switch's ports to an
available port on the pf machine.
Does there exist a nice way to do this without further sub-dividing
the /28?
Thoughts?
--patrick
--
IS-IS sleeps.
BGP peers are quiet.
Something must be wrong.
