Here are the logs for my failed attempts at joining the misc mailing list. All with default spamd settings.
Like I said, it did not succeed until I added lists.openbsd.org to the /etc/mail/nospamd and reloaded the pf rule. May 15 23:48:58 mx spamd[6698]: new entry 192.43.244.163 from <[email protected]> to <[email protected]>, helo shear.ucar.edu May 15 23:48:58 mx spamd[6698]: new entry 192.43.244.163 from <[email protected]> to <[email protected]>, helo shear.ucar.edu May 16 03:49:42 mx spamd[11000]: queueing deletion of 192.43.244.163 shear.ucar.edu <[email protected]> <[email protected]> May 16 03:49:42 mx spamd[11000]: queueing deletion of 192.43.244.163 shear.ucar.edu <[email protected]> <[email protected]> May 16 06:17:03 mx spamd[6698]: new entry 192.43.244.163 from <[email protected]> to <[email protected]>, helo shear.ucar.edu May 16 06:17:03 mx spamd[6698]: new entry 192.43.244.163 from <[email protected]> to <[email protected]>, helo shear.ucar.edu May 16 06:23:34 mx spamd[6698]: new entry 192.43.244.163 from <[email protected]> to <[email protected]>, helo shear.ucar.edu May 16 06:28:40 mx spamd[6698]: new entry 192.43.244.163 from <[email protected]> to <[email protected]>, helo shear.ucar.edu May 16 10:17:46 mx spamd[11000]: queueing deletion of 192.43.244.163 shear.ucar.edu <[email protected]> <[email protected]> May 16 10:17:46 mx spamd[11000]: queueing deletion of 192.43.244.163 shear.ucar.edu <[email protected]> <[email protected]> May 16 10:23:47 mx spamd[11000]: queueing deletion of 192.43.244.163 shear.ucar.edu <[email protected]> <[email protected]> May 16 10:28:47 mx spamd[11000]: queueing deletion of 192.43.244.163 shear.ucar.edu <[email protected]> <[email protected]> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:26:19AM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote: > Dear David, > > I don't understand how spamd deletes any message. It never does. > > Can you clarify? I am certain your observation is wrong; it is something > else. I wish to know more. > > Thanks. > > -Girish > > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, David Diggles <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since upgrading from 4.9 to 5.1, I am getting a lot of false positives > > with spamd running in greylisting mode, from email addresses I > > previously did not. > > > > A number of false negatives are still getting through, too. > > > > Eg: I needed to add lists.openbsd.org to /etc/mail/nospamd to receive > > messages from this list, or spamdb would delete the messages. > > > > How can I tune this to make spamd more forgiving? ?The default -G > > options in spamd(8) do not seem to be taking effect. ?I emailed > > someone yesterday, received a reply. Then today, they emailed me again > > from the same address and their messages were deleted by spamdb. > > > > What conditions cause an address to move from grey to white, or grey > > to black? > > > > Trying to get my head around this, and losing emails all the while.. > > > > .d.d. > > > > > > -- > Gayatri Hitech > http://gayatri-hitech.com
