On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:23:59AM +0100, Xavier Beaudouin wrote: > Hi there... > > Seems I have found some memory leak inside bgpd... > > When I set route-collector no in bgpd.conf my bgpd processes seems to > growing and growing (I had some process to grow using more than 1G of > total memory) when running it several days. > > But.... > > When I just comment it : > > #route-collector no > > The bgpd system is working correctly without any problems... >
Hmm. That does not make sense. #route-collector no and route-collector no result in the same action. As "route-collector no" is the default action. Will have a look at it. > I have tested that on production system with 2 full view and 2 ibgp view... > > If you need some more informations and examples please drop me a email. > > (note this bug has been seen on 3.7 Release on sparc64 and on 3.8 beta > on x86... I think it is on 3.8 release also but I didn't tested yet).. > Hmm. If possible the full config could be helpful. Any idea how fast it is leaking memory? -- :wq Claudio
