On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Rod Whitworth <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:09:31 +0000, Julien Crapovich wrote: > >>Hello. >>Absolutely, but compiling without INET6 is not supposed to generate error. >>I've just disabled INET6 on GENERIC file, not other hack. >> > You are the only one who knows exactly what you did. B Maybe. > Why should we waste time guessing? > > It's a pretty damn stupid thing to do anyway when it is so easy to > block v6 traffic using GENERIC and, BTW, your kernel is NOT GENERIC. > It doesn't matter that you were too ignorant to change the name...
i don't understand what does renaming the kernel has to do with anything the op is right in that "rmoption INET6" is broken, end of whether that define was meant for developers only or not is another matter > > R/ > > *** NOTE *** Please DO NOT CC me. I <am> subscribed to the list. > Mail to the sender address that does not originate at the list server is tarpitted. The reply-to: address is provided for those who feel compelled to reply off list. Thankyou. > > Rod/ > --- > This life is not the real thing. > It is not even in Beta. > If it was, then OpenBSD would already have a man page for it.
