Heya :)

> 
> well, I don't know about BSD in general, but just try it with 
> OpenBSD. If the machine is generally capable of this task 
> (has the mem and power to suppert n sessions in parallel), 
> it's just your task as admin to make it happen. The means are 
> there. If your users bring down your machine it's most 
> probably your own fault.

You may well be right, though I would say that the amount of
Code changes users would be required to do, to make it work
Would end up in my lap, seeing as there are some things OpenBSD's
Kernel does not have, or has fairly out of date versions of

One example I can think of is libpcap - and it seems to be
Lagging behind more because some folks are upset that the devs
There won't accept their commits, then actually fixing the software.

Perhaps I will port it .. And see how many people yell at me for
That. :)

Resource use in general was the problem - you can't lock them down
entirely, because the progs use 99.9 CPU when starting, then settle
to 2 or 4.. So using something like lshell, or equiv. Doesn't work
very well. I use a prog that simple snaps a picture of the proc
table every half hour, and kills things that are over their limit
for 2 runs. Problem comes into play when a user starts say .. 50
Copies of the same thing, because it didn't boot.. They just keep
hitting the button .. :( .. Something Kernel level has saved the
box from dying many times.

-D.

Reply via email to